![]() Yes, exercises have functional uses like those outlined by Geng. Irreconcilable differences over purposes and power beget open-ended strategic competition. Challengers such as China and Russia want to amend that system while carving out their own places in the sun of great naval power. The United States wants to preserve its primacy, along with the liberal maritime order over which it has presided since the end of World War II. ![]() It represents normalcy in a world of geostrategic competition - the kind of world that’s making a comeback following a quarter-century of seaborne U.S. It was predictable that an allied fleet would eventually put in an appearance off NATO’s southern, nautical flank.ĭoes a Sino-Russian naval presence off NATO seaboards sound frightening to you? It shouldn’t - there’s nothing new nor especially worrisome here. Yes, Moscow and Beijing chose the venue precisely to be provocative - the exercise is a throwback to Soviet maneuvers in the Mediterranean 40 years ago. and Chinese navies clash?ĭespite the soothing words, some Western commentators opined that Europe’s middle sea constitutes an “unlikely and provocative venue” for this venture. Tense times in the Pacific: Could the U.S.China’s maritime strategy: How Beijing plans to rule the high seas.The strange trip of China’s first aircraft carrier: And what it says about Beijing’s naval ambitions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |